Showing posts with label orientalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label orientalism. Show all posts

Saturday, January 7, 2023

The word 'oriental' in political discourse

Orientalism is a type of discourse that assumes a binary opposition of West and East, home and foreign, normal and strange, moral and debauched, etc. The language of Orientalism

"brings opposites together as 'natural,' it presents human types in scholarly idioms and methodologies, it ascribes reality and reference to objects (other words) of its own making. Mythic language is discourse, that is, it cannot be anything but systematic; one does not really make discourse at will, or statements in it, without first belonging — in some cases unconsciously, but at any rate involuntarily — to the ideology and the institutions that guarantee its existence. These latter are always the institutions of an advanced society dealing with a less advanced society, a strong culture encountering a weak one. The principal feature of mythic discourse is that it conceals its own origins as well as those of what it describes. 'Arabs' are presented in the imagery of static, almost ideal types, and neither as creatures with a potential in the process of being realized nor as history being made."
Edward Said, Orientalism

For more, see my article: "What is 'Orientalism'? Edward Said's definition of the term" (10-minute read), Medium


The idea of "oriental" has been imposed on people in various ways to mark them as different, dangerous, or unworthy. For example, in Löwenthal and Guterman's study of fascist discourse, especially U.S. rhetoric against Jews:

"Among these alleged distinctive traits, there is first of all the Jew’s undefinable foreignness. The word epitomizing this trait of foreignness is 'oriental' or 'Asiatic.' The agitator speaks deprecatingly of 'orientals who are American citizens,' of oriental concepts of government, of oriental mobs that overrun the White House, of oriental aliens that invade our rich nation and rifle the cash register, etc., etc. Associations of the forbidden, immoral, and luscious seem to play a role in the use of the term 'oriental.'"
Leo Löwenthal and Norbert Guterman. Prophets of Deceit: A Study of the Techniques of the American Agitator. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1949. pp. 76–77.
"...growing backlash against the Damascus Affair, when local Jews were accused of the ritual murder and consumption of a Capuchin friar and his assistant in 1840. Fueled by the revival of the blood libel canard and stereotyping of Jews from that part of the world as sexually aggressive and libertine, French Jews (including James and Solomon Rothschild) who supported their ‘Oriental’ coreligionists had their loyalty doubted and their motives questioned again and again."
Mike Rothschild, Jewish Space Lasers: The Rothschilds and 200 Years of Conspiracy Theories, Melville House, 2023, Chapter 4. Citing: Julie Kalman, “Sensuality, Depravity, and Ritual Murder: The Damascus Blood Libel and Jews in France,” Jewish Social Studies 13, no. 3 (2007): 35–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4467774

Suez Canal

Anthony Trollope has a short story, "An Unprotected Female at the Pyramids," first published in 1861 midway through the construction of the Suez. It begins:

"In the happy days when we were young, no description conveyed to us so complete an idea of mysterious reality as that of an Oriental city. We knew it was actually there, but had such vague notions of its ways and looks! Let any one remember his early impressions as to Bagdad or Grand Cairo, and then say if this was not so. It was probably taken from the “Arabian Nights,” and the picture produced was one of strange, fantastic, luxurious houses; of women who were either very young and very beautiful, or else very old and very cunning; but in either state exercising much more influence in life than women in the East do now; of good-natured, capricious, though sometimes tyrannical monarchs; and of life full of quaint mysteries, quite unintelligible in every phasis, and on that account the more picturesque."

Trollope continues:

"But the route to India and Australia has changed all this. Men from all countries going to the East, now pass through Cairo, and its streets and costumes are no longer strange to us. It has become also a resort for invalids, or rather for those who fear that they may become invalids if they remain in a cold climate during the winter months. And thus at Cairo there is always to be found a considerable population of French, Americans, and of English. Oriental life is brought home to us, dreadfully diluted by western customs, and the delights of the “Arabian Nights” are shorn of half their value. When we have seen a thing it is never so magnificent to us as when it was half unknown.

It is not much that we deign to learn from these Orientals,—we who glory in our civilisation. We do not copy their silence or their abstemiousness, nor that invariable mindfulness of his own personal dignity which always adheres to a Turk or to an Arab. We chatter as much at Cairo as elsewhere, and eat as much and drink as much, and dress ourselves generally in the same old ugly costume. But we do usually take upon ourselves to wear red caps, and we do ride on donkeys.

Nor are the visitors from the West to Cairo by any means confined to the male sex. Ladies are to be seen in the streets quite regardless of the Mahommedan custom which presumes a veil to be necessary for an appearance in public; and, to tell the truth, the Mahommedans in general do not appear to be much shocked by their effrontery.

A quarter of the town has in this way become inhabited by men wearing coats and waistcoats, and by women who are without veils; but the English tongue in Egypt finds its centre at Shepheard’s Hotel.

Mike Rothschild, in Jewish Space Lasers, mentions Trollope as someone who used “thinly veiled Rothschild or Jewish banker caricatures as financier villains and scapegoats.” Rothschild goes on to discuss the Suez Canal:

“The [Suez] canal had opened in 1869, with its construction taking eleven years, funded mostly by the French government, and carried out at least partly by forced laborers who died by the thousands. The canal was seen by England as a threat to their geopolitical dominance and dismissed as too risky by other major players like Russia, Austria, and the US, none of which invested in it.

But by 1875, debt from the canal’s massive construction cost, the bankruptcy of the Ottoman Empire (another shareholder), and the profligate overspending of the Egyptian Khedive (viceroy) forced Egypt to sell their share in the Suez Company.” (Chapter 5)


There are academic roots

For example:

"Friedrich [Schlegel] being Friedrich, he had found a new subject. Making use of Persian and Indian manuscripts the French had plundered from libraries and private collections while on their warpath across Europe, Friedrich Schlegel now began to study Persian and Sanskrit. ‘I feel unbelievably drawn to Oriental things,’ he wrote to Ludwig Tieck, buzzing with new ideas about the importance of Sanskrit as ‘the root of all language’ and its influence on Greek, Latin and the Germanic languages. He was so obsessed with the subject that he published the first comprehensive study of Sanskrit in Germany in 1808, On the Language and Wisdom of the Indians, which also included translations of ancient texts."
Andrea Wulf. Magnificent Rebels: The First Romantics and the Invention of the Self. Knopf, 2022.

Also, tourism

"In Tangier, Emily Sibley Watson has an opportunity to visit women in a harem, an event that was becoming popular for tourists in the late 19th century. Sarah Graham-Brown, in Images of Women: The Portrayal of Women in Photography of the Middle East 1860-1950 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, p. 77-78), writes that: 'with neither common language nor comprehension of each other's cultures, these encounters could be almost comic in their air of mutual incomprehension.'" — Sibley Watson Digital Archive

Ancient history

"This was always the Greek take on Persians: they weren’t real men. A famous Attic red-figure wine jug commemorates the Greek victory over these stereotyped foes. The Eurymedon Vase (ca. 460 BCE) depicts a Greek soldier, erect phallus in hand, approaching a Persian victim from behind as the latter bends over in horror. While these Greeks drank to their victories, they liked to remember how they really gave it to those Persians, so to speak."
Stephen J. Patterson. The Forgotten Creed: Christianity’s Original Struggle against Bigotry, Slavery, and Sexism. New York: Oxford University Press. 2018. pp. 33–34.

See also

Sensuality, Depravity, and Ritual Murder: The Damascus Blood Libel and Jews in France. Julie Kalman, Jewish Social Studies, New Series, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Spring - Summer, 2007), pp. 35-58 (24 pages). Published By: Indiana University Press

golden temple

Homonationalism is orientalist:

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

An unknown masterpiece of medieval Hindu tales introduced to English readers

In 1917, while studying at the Central Library in Kensington, London, to make a thorough inventory of Richard Francis Burton's writings, the independent scholar Norman Mosley Penzer stumbled across a strange and haunting collection of stories. It was eleventh-century Indian literature known as the Katha Sarit Sagara, or the Ocean of Story, written around 1070 by Somadeva, the court poet for Kashmir. It was translated from the Sanskrit into English by Charles Henry Tawney (1837-1922) – a linguist of Sanskrit, Hindi, Urdu, and Persian who had studied at Cambridge and gone to India in 1865 – and printed by the Asiatic Society of Bengal in a small series called Bibliotheca Indica (1880-1884).

Penzer would go on to release his own annotated reprint of Tawney's work in the 1920s. The story of his effort is documented in the book itself, in contemporary reviews, and in his preserved personal correspondence.

The Ocean of Story is a large collection of spiritual allegories involving divine agents and magic. It encompasses everything between birth and death, including romance, trickery, swift horses, menacing lions, and the pursuit of enlightenment. As the Morning Post wrote on Aug. 10, 1926, "it is of the same order as the Arabian Nights, the Decameron, and the Canterbury Tales, stories strung together like a necklace of beads, a convention beloved by the Middle Ages..." Of particular interest to the European audience was the myth of the "poison-damsel," that is, women with poisonous blood sent to assassinate enemies.

Penzer recognized that the passage he encountered "must belong to a work of the highest importance...I felt instinctively that this odd part of an unknown Indian work was to be of the utmost importance to me personally," even though "I could lay no claim whatever to Oriental scholarship." He temporarily switched his research focus away from Burton to learn more about the Ocean of Story.

Penzer first wrote to Tawney on July 26, 1919 to pitch the idea of a multi-volume reprint of his translation that would be enhanced by some updated notes on history and context. Tawney responded immediately with encouragement, but made clear – in letters on July 28 and Aug. 4 – that, at age 81, facing eviction from his house, he would not be able to participate intellectually or financially. His only advice was that Penzer use a horizontal line over a vowel to indicate its "long" nature in Sanskrit, rather than the "acute accent" mark that Tawney regretted using in his earlier work. "I shall always retain a feeling that you have paid me an undeserved compliment," he closed.

It took some effort for Penzer to find a willing publisher. This he found in the proprietor of Chas. J. Sawyer books in London (a business that operated from 1894 until 2012). In his "Retrospect" in Vol. IX, Penzer recalled Sawyer as saying that, although he had never before heard of the Ocean of Story, he sensed it to be "an unknown masterpiece" that he would be pleased to back financially.

The work was sold on a subscription basis; its ten volumes were released serially. The publisher asked 18 guineas up front for the full set, although it seems that the asking price dropped over time. The advertising brochure said that "each volume consists of approximately 350 pages…The binding is black buckram, with gold medallions on the front cover and back, with a gold ribbon marker and top edges gilt," and that it would look pleasing alongside Burton's translation of the Arabian Nights. The print run was limited to 1500 sets.

In 1923, Penzer published his Annotated Bibliography of Sir Richard Francis Burton. In his entry for Burton's adaptation of "Vikram and the Vampire," he found reason to insert an extended mention of the Ocean of Story, although it was generally otherwise unrelated to Burton's work.

The next year, in 1924, the first volume of the new Ocean of Story was released. Tawney did not live to see it.

The work did not merely reprint Tawney's translation. Penzer added extensive notes and comments, and forewords were written for volumes I through IX, respectively, by Sir Richard Carnac Temple, Sir George A. Grierson, M. Gaster, F. W. Thomas, E. Denison Ross, A. R. Wright, Maurice Bloomfield, W. R. Halliday, and Sir Atul Chatterjee. The tenth volume contained the appendices and index.

When Grierson wrote to Penzer on Aug. 6, 1924 expressing his interest in writing a foreword for the second volume, he explained that he would require three weeks to complete the task due to his poor eyesight. The same affliction plagued other elderly scholars. Bloomfield was originally invited to write his foreword for the sixth volume, but he wrote to Penzer on June 4, 1926 explaining that he could no longer read small print, "and with that taboo goes a glimmering of anything like investigation." Agreeing to a postponement, he mailed his completed foreword to Penzer on Oct. 31, 1926, and it was included in the seventh volume.

The collection received a great deal of attention in the popular newspapers and the literary press. The Times Literary Supplement gushed on Aug. 14, 1924:  "Of Mr Penzer's notes and appendices, no praise can be excessive." The same publication later reviewed Volumes II and III under the headline "The Hindu Nights," drawing a comparison with the better-known Arabian Nights. The Liverpool Post wrote on Jan. 16, 1927 that Tawney "never indulges in cheap Orientalism, nor does he try to Westernise these stories...His language...translates us into another world."

Halliday came to Penzer's attention when he reviewed Volumes I and II of the Ocean of Story for the journal Folk-Lore, particularly as his reviews chiefly complained of factual inaccuracies. Halliday's review of Volume III was rather more complimentary, accompanied by the disclaimer that "I feel that I owe Mr. Penzer amends, particularly as he has heaped coals of fire upon my head by allowing me to write a Foreword to volume VIII."

At the end of the ninth volume, Penzer wrote a "Terminal Essay" in which he extended appreciation to the others involved in his project. "My idea of inviting a different scholar to write a Foreword to each volume has proved a great success, and my work is now enriched by nine excellent Essays, each dealing with the great collection from a different angle," he wrote.

In October 1924, the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society attempted a brief list of examples of the contents of the Ocean of Story:  "...deisul or circunambulation, the chastity index motif, the external soul motif, the Garuda Bird, the Paisachi language, the Ghandharva form of marriage, communicating by signs, the entrapped suitor motif, and the magical articles motif." The Spectator explained on Nov. 20, 1926 that "there had been a great intermixture of cultures by the time of Somadeva. There are tales which are obviously derived from the pre-Aryan civilisation of India; there are Greek, Mongolian, and Arabic influences."

"Mr. Penzer's wide knowledge of the literary sources," said the Manchester Guardian on Aug. 19, 1926, "has enabled him to quote a larger number of analogous tales from other countries, and his references range from Ancient Egypt to the Norse; but he has not yet had an opportunity to grapple thoroughly with the problem."

After Tawney's death, Penzer remained in touch with his family members. On Jan. 5, 1928, Penzer received a letter from one of Tawney's children in King's Pride, Camberley: "I got your very kind letter this morning and I liked so very much what you said about Father and thank you very much for thinking it and saying it...One of his last regrets was his book had not been appreciated...but as you say perhaps he does know."

On the back of a postcard with one penny of pre-printed postage, Penzer wrote: "Finished the 'Ocean of Story' on Saturday, Jan. 21st 1928 at 9.52 A.M."  He kept the postcard. The tenth and final volume containing the index was published that February.

Penzer died in 1960. At some point, his personal correspondence and newspaper clippings related to the Ocean of Story came into the possession of Chas. J. Sawyer Booksellers. On Mar. 27, 1972, Sawyer sold the collection of "Orientalia Penzer, Miscellanea relating to Ocean of Story" for 50 pounds to a private collector in the United States. This was Morris Harold Saffron, a physician with a historical interest in medieval medicine, whose English translation of the work of the twelfth-century Maurus of Salerno had just been published two months previously. Saffron had studied at Columbia University in New York City, and today the Penzer miscellanea are under the curation of Columbia's Rare Book and Manuscript Library.

Originally posted to Helium Network, Jan. 24, 2013.

Image: Entrance to the Golden Temple, Amritsar, India, c. 1907, by Herbert Ponting (1870-1935) © The Commons. No known copyright restrictions. Flickr.


If you'd like to learn more about my work, I've published books. Also, I write for Medium.