Showing posts with label imagination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label imagination. Show all posts

Sunday, April 16, 2023

Magical realism: Reality invaded by the unbelievably strange

Literary magic realism originated in Latin America. English Wikipedia today describes it:

"Cuban writer Alejo Carpentier and Venezuelan Arturo Uslar-Pietri, for example, were strongly influenced by European artistic movements, such as Surrealism, during their stays in Paris in the 1920s and 1930s. One major event that linked painterly and literary magic realisms was the translation and publication of Franz Roh's book into Spanish by Spain's Revista de Occidente in 1927, headed by major literary figure José Ortega y Gasset. "Within a year, Magic Realism was being applied to the prose of European authors in the literary circles of Buenos Aires." Jorge Luis Borges inspired and encouraged other Latin American writers in the development of magical realism – particularly with his first magical realist publication, Historia universal de la infamia in 1935. Between 1940 and 1950, magical realism in Latin America reached its peak, with prominent writers appearing mainly in Argentina. Alejo Carpentier's novel The Kingdom of This World, published in 1949, is often characterised as an important harbinger of magic realism, which reached its most canonical incarnation in Gabriel García Marquez's novel One Hundred Years of Solitude (1967)."

Read more on Spanish Wikipedia.

At the beginning of the series Narcos, a definition of magical realism:

Magical realism is defined as what happens when a highly detailed, realistic setting is invaded by something too strange to believe.

"...what happens when a highly detailed, realistic setting is invaded by something too strange to believe."

This definition comes from Strecher, Matthew C. 1999. "Magical Realism and the Search for Identity in the Fiction of Murakami Haruki." Journal of Japanese Studies 25(2):263–98. p. 267.

"¿cómo se construye la ciencia ficción en un lugar donde los conceptos hegemónicos de ciencia no coinciden con los que se han construido en nuestras culturas? * * * Las principales negaciones que se implantan sobre la ciencia ficción latinoamericana están dictadas por la forma en la que se ha entendido la anglosajona y europea; por ello se suele decir que en Latinoamérica NO se habla realmente de ciencia, que NO hay ciencia ficción sino fantástico, que NO hay una identidad consolidada como en otros lugares, y otras tesis del mismo perfil. * * * Concibamos un mundo en el que gracias a los conjuros del ciberchamanismo y los futuros andinos espaciales, ahora los guacamayos vuelen entre galaxias, canten himnos espacio-temporales y embellezcan con sus colores a nuestra madre universo." — Rodrigo Bastidas Pérez, prólogo a la antología El tercer mundo después del sol

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Berkeley: What color is that dismembered body part you are imagining?

In the last post, we quoted a 1772 text from David Hume that referred to compound ideas, that is, the combination of known concepts such as "gold" and "mountain" to generate new ideas and fantasies such as "golden mountains." Here is a similar idea from George Berkeley, 62 years earlier:

...for myself, I find indeed I have a faculty of imagining, or representing to myself, the ideas of those particular things I have perceived, and of variously compounding and dividing them. I can imagine a man with two heads, or the upper parts of a man joined to the body of a horse. I can consider the hand, the eye, the nose, each by itself abstracted or separated from the rest of the body. But then whatever hand or eye I imagine, it must have some particular shape and colour. Likewise the idea of man that I frame to myself must be either of a white, or a black, or a tawny, a straight, or a crooked, a tall, or a low, or a middle-sized man. I cannot by any effort of thought conceive the abstract idea above described. And it is equally impossible for me to form the abstract idea of motion distinct from the body moving, and which is neither swift nor slow, curvilinear nor rectilinear; and the like may be said of all other abstract general ideas whatsoever.

Rightly (in my opinion) Berkeley points out that, while one can imagine a human being, one cannot imagine a human being without particular qualities of height, color, etc. This illustrates two meanings of the word "abstract." One can imagine an abstract human, or even an abstract body part such as a hand or head, separated from all context and having no basis in reality; but remove all physical description and sensory reference points from the abstract idea, and it is no longer an image of anything. I imagine the same is true with virtue. When we imagine virtue, we imagine examples of virtue. The abstract ideas of kindness or honesty would mean nothing if they were so far abstracted as to be no longer grounded in human relationships.
Source: George Berkeley. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. (1710) Introduction, Paragraph 10.

If you'd like to learn more about my work, I've published books. Also, I write for Medium. There, readers with a paid membership don't have to worry about the paywall.